Web4 okt. 2024 · STATE OF U.P AND OTHERS’ (1963 AIR 1295, 1964 SCR (1) 332 ) This very famous case is related to the Fundamental Rights which is granted in our Constitution of India under Article 14 to 32. This case is a very famous case on the infringement of Constitutional Rights of the Petitioner, Kharak Sigh who was charged for the dacoity and … PT Kharak Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh Closed Expands Expression Mode of Expression Non-verbal Expression Date of Decision December 18, 1962 Outcome Decision Outcome (Disposition/Ruling), Law or Action Overturned or Deemed Unconstitutional Case Number AIR 1963 SC 1295 Region & … Meer weergeven The Supreme Court of India declared the relevant provisions that allowed police to make domiciliary visits to ‘habitual criminals’ or individuals likely to become habitual criminals as unconstitutional. The police would … Meer weergeven The six-judge bench of the Supreme Court gave concurring opinions, striking down the relevant provisions of the Uttar Pradesh Police Regulations as unconstitutional. … Meer weergeven The petitioner, Kharak Singh, had been charged with violent robbery as part of an armed gang in 1941. He was released due to lack of evidence, but a ‘history sheet’ was opened in regard to him under the Uttar Pradesh … Meer weergeven
Blog
WebThe Dogra dynasty of Dogra Rajputs from the Shiwalik Himalayas created Jammu and Kashmir when all dynastic kingdoms in India were being absorbed by the East India Company.Events led the Sikh Empire to recognise Jammu as a vassal state in 1820, and later the British added Kashmir to Jammu by the Treaty of Amritsar in 1846. The founder … Web8 mei 2024 · Kharak Singh v State of UP and others [1963 AIR 1295] It was held that personal liberty in Article 21 is comprehensive to include all varieties of rights … barbara de lima
Right to privacy under Article 21: A Case study - Legal Services …
WebThe bench has overruled its decisions in M.P. Sharma v Satish Chandra, District Magistrate, Delhi (1954), rendered by a bench of eight judges and, in Kharak Singh v State of Uttar Pradesh... WebThe Supreme Court for the first time extensively discussed the right to privacy under Articles 19(1)(d) and 21 of the Constitution in the context of police surveillance. The … Web12 jul. 2024 · Rakesh V. State of UP- In the case, a conviction was brought in accordance with Sections 302 and 34 (which prohibit the killing of a group of individuals whose … barbara de martino