WebMay 20, 2014 · In Johnstone, the Federal Court of Canada held that the test in Campbell River was too stringent, and instead held that family status discrimination claims … WebAug 25, 2015 · This article discusses the Federal Court of Appeal decision on Canada (Attorney General) v.Johnstone, 2014 FCA 110.The issue in this case was whether a mother was discriminated against based on “family status” because her employer refused to give her the work schedule that she said she needed to look after her children.

Canada (A.G.) v. Johnstone (2014) - LEAF

WebJun 3, 2013 · An employer’s failing to accommodate an employee’s childcare needs constitutes “family status” discrimination under the Canadian Human Rights Act. Fiona … crystal iseldyke

Canada: Family Status Quo For British Columbia

WebIn Attorney General of Canada v. Johnstone, 2014 FCA 110, the Federal Court of Appeal issued the latest decision in the long-running saga to determine the scope of family … WebFind the decision made in Canada (Attorney General) v. Johnstone, 2014 FCA 110 (Canlil), where the Federal Court of Appeal examined whether an employer has an obligation, when accommodating "family status", to consider the employee's child care obligations. In that case, the complainant and her husband were both employed by … Fiona Johnstone and her husband worked for the Canadian Border Services Agency (CBSA). Neither had predictable work schedules, and so Ms. Johnstone asked the CBSA to allow her to have a regular shift so she could make ongoing child care arrangements. The CBSA had accommodated the request of a set … See more LEAF argued that the ground of “family status” included caregiving responsibilities arising from family relationships. The gendered reality of caregiving responsibilities … See more The Federal Court of Appeal dismissed the CBSA’s appeal, aside from some variations on the remedy given to Ms. Johnstone. The … See more crystalise perth